Introduction: Planning for Profit, Not Pitfalls
In Victoria’s dynamic property market, success for developers is increasingly defined by strategic foresight rather than chance. With the state’s planning system undergoing significant updates in 2025, including changes to ResCode and the introduction of new development standards, understanding the legal landscape is more critical than ever. This is where proactive engagement with town planning becomes a powerful tool, not a bureaucratic hurdle. Rather than viewing planning controls as a series of restrictions, successful developers recognise them as a framework for seamless approvals and maximised profitability. By investing in a strategic approach from the outset—from site selection to community engagement—developers can dramatically reduce the risk of costly delays, council refusals, neighbour objections, and VCAT appeals.
The Hidden Costs of a “Red Flag” Site
The most critical decision in any development is site selection. An attractive price can mask hidden planning risks that lead to financial disaster. A thorough analysis of a site’s zoning and overlays is non-negotiable. You must go beyond the basic maps and understand the implications of a Neighbourhood Character Overlay (NCO) or a Heritage Overlay (HO), which can introduce subjective assessment requirements and severely limit development options.
A key area of concern is tree protection. A site with a Vegetation Protection Overlay (VPO) or large, established trees on a council’s significant tree register may be a “red flag”. Construction within a tree’s protection zone—which can extend up to twice its canopy radius—can be prohibited, rendering a site undevelopable. The costs associated with arborist reports, tree protection measures, and replacement plantings can quickly erode a project’s profitability. Savvy developers know to identify these issues during the due diligence phase to avoid sites that are financially unviable from the start.
Maximising Potential by Mastering the Rules
The 2025 updates to Victoria’s residential development standards have created new opportunities for informed developers. The new Townhouse and Low-Rise Code (Clause 55) and the 4 Storey Apartments Standards (Clause 57) move away from a one-size-fits-all approach towards performance-based standards that reward quality design.
Mastering key design standards is essential for a smooth approval process:
- Setbacks and Height Limits: Strategic design can go beyond minimum setback requirements to create a development that enhances the streetscape, earns community support, and maximises internal amenity. Similarly, understanding the difference between statutory and discretionary height limits allows developers to optimise a building’s height for enhanced outcomes.
- Overlooking and Overshadowing: Compliance with these provisions is fundamental to avoiding neighbour objections. This involves strategically placing windows, using screening solutions, and designing buildings to minimise overshadowing of a neighbour’s private open space. Successful projects use these standards as a creative challenge, integrating design features that both meet regulations and become a marketing advantage.
The Proactive Path to Minimising Objections
The most effective way to manage objections is to prevent them. This requires a proactive approach that includes early and genuine engagement with councils and the community.
- Council Engagement: Pre-application meetings with council planning staff are invaluable. This allows developers to discuss project concepts, receive guidance, and demonstrate professional competence before lodging a formal application. Building these relationships is a long-term strategy that can lead to smoother approval processes.
- Community Consultation: Proactive, developer-led consultation can transform potential opposition into support. By holding information sessions and actively listening to concerns, developers can make minor design concessions that address key issues, thereby reducing formal objections and expediting the approval process.
Conclusion: Avoiding VCAT is the Ultimate Win
The final arbiter of planning disputes is the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), but the most successful strategy is to avoid the tribunal entirely. VCAT proceedings introduce significant costs and uncertainty, with legal representation and expert witness fees ranging from $50,000 to over $500,000 in complex cases. By preparing a robust and comprehensive application that pre-emptively addresses potential objections, a developer can significantly reduce the likelihood of a council refusal or an objector appeal.
Ultimately, the blueprint for success lies in an integrated approach. By strategically selecting sites, designing with foresight, and engaging proactively with all stakeholders, developers can navigate Victoria’s complex planning system with confidence, ensuring their projects are not only profitable but also seamlessly approved and respected by the community.
Read the full white paper on Hayton Kosky Legal Blog